(no subject)
Aug. 22nd, 2002 01:05 pmSo I was talking to someone about BDS&M stuff the other day... actually mostly just about bondage. And at some point I said that I think most people are a little bit attracted (or turned on, more like) to a small amount of it. Not necessarily in a way that would be expressed regularly, but just kind of in the back of the mind.
Anyway, talking to
tanaise about it, she said this... "And I think that probably everyone has a little S/M side to themselves because everyone simultaneously wants completely control of their lives and total bossing about by someone else." And I think she makes a valid point...
Anyway, talking to
no subject
Date: 2002-08-22 11:03 am (UTC)Makes sense.
We all want our choice and our freedom. We want to be able to do what we want which implies freedom and strength. All the things we're taught by our society, our environment and our own selfishness that we want.
But that doesn't give security. Being told what to do, bossed around, and limited provides security; it reassures us that someone cares enough to take care of us, even down to the minutiae.
's true.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-22 11:22 am (UTC)Yes, exactly. Thank you for getting this. It's the treasured-pet thing. :)
I'm more into the psychological side of things than into getting cuffed to the bed or whatnot...
no subject
Date: 2002-08-22 12:09 pm (UTC)See, to me, this indicates that I am incapable of handling something myself. Which I loathe.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-22 12:21 pm (UTC)A Dom (no names!) I liked very much wouldn't give me orders that would interfere with my ability to do things or my pride in doing so - his "bossing around" was in subtler ways, like telling me to wear the blue shirt, with my hair loose. How he wanted his sub to look. Or to act, in scene.
A good Dom won't bleed over into your everyday life, telling you how to organize your closet or balance your checkbook, but I enjoy limitations like clothing choice. *blush*
no subject
Date: 2002-08-22 12:29 pm (UTC)One of the guys at work told me he could easily see me as a sub, even though I think for the most part I'm dominant in most non-erotic situations. And I don't know that he's right, but there could be something to it. But then again, I do work in a service department too (though I refrain from saying "I live to serve" for the most part, okay, once in a while I say that jokingly, but still).
no subject
Date: 2002-08-22 12:38 pm (UTC)And yeah, people who have dominant roles in everyday life to tend to be sub in the sack. :)
no subject
Date: 2002-08-22 01:01 pm (UTC)I've been in a situation where the stopword was ignored. It is not pleasant. Not pleasant at all.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-22 05:14 pm (UTC)About the ignoring the stopword: You need to have a better screening process in place. Seriously. Have me interview your men or something. You should never be with someone who'll ignore your safeword...
Re:
Date: 2002-08-23 05:03 am (UTC)And he'll be at D*C. Whoo.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-23 05:17 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-08-23 05:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-08-23 07:05 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-08-23 07:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-08-22 02:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-08-22 05:16 pm (UTC)q
no subject
Date: 2002-08-22 12:33 pm (UTC)I get resentful of that kind of security though. I'm not sure why. I'm not that truly independant, but I really dislike people trying to use that kind of hold over me. I get resentful, and break free.