(no subject)
Sep. 9th, 2003 09:23 amI just still don't get why Willow is a lesbian rather than bi.
I mean, okay, yes, it's an internal thing, and you can't understand other peoples internal identifications, never mind a fictional persons, but still. It seems that in TV world there are no bisexuals.
I mean, okay, yes, it's an internal thing, and you can't understand other peoples internal identifications, never mind a fictional persons, but still. It seems that in TV world there are no bisexuals.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 06:32 am (UTC)You could also argue that we've only seen a few years of their lives; people often take a long time to decide which bit of the non-closet room to go stand in.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 06:46 am (UTC)And really, what I say and who I am, and how I self identify... I suppose aren't really necessarily huge public issues. They can be (well, I mean, not for me, I'm not famous or fictional) but it's an individual thing. Sorry... babbling again. :)
no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 06:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 07:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 06:58 am (UTC)I was thinking that she'd said something along the lines of "Lesbian, now" once, but it's possible that I'm just thinking of the one Christmasy episode where she said, "Still Jewish here," and mixing it with the oh-so-famous "Bored now."
She said it a few times
Date: 2003-09-09 07:59 am (UTC)I took it as the producers (or network) being converned that the audience would not accept Willow as gay (because of prior love interests) and thought that acknowledging the bi issue would confuse the poor stupid audience. If she's still capable of loving men, they reason, then how can her love of a woman be true love? (Networks, esp UPN, are often stuuupid about social issues)
Re: She said it a few times
Date: 2003-09-09 08:40 am (UTC)Re: She said it a few times
Date: 2003-09-09 11:38 am (UTC)However, IIRC, in one of the commentaries in the season 4 DVDs, something was said about her relationship with Oz really being platonic, even though they'd had sex -- that they loved each other in a non-romantic way, but mistook it for romance because boy/girl is the norm. They didn't say that in so many words, mind you, but that seemed like the implication.
The problem I have with that is that it seems like such a retcon, 'cause the way she talked and felt about Xander in Season 1 did not seem like someone who had a crush solely because it was expected of her, and she just hadn't realized yet that women were her thing. That just doesn't feel true when I watch Season 1. So I think it just makes more sense to let her be bi.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 07:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 07:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 08:34 am (UTC)it may also stem from the male fantasy that any "lesbian" will be attracted to "the right man," not to mention that "lesbians" in porn appear to have sex with both men and women.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 09:53 am (UTC)but I've wondered that many times.
Ah well, we'll have to hide in the TV Closet until someone delivers our Bi-Champion. ;)