Perhaps. Celia claims one can. If one were to send a non-work-related piece of mail to another person in the same company, she's saying it's misuse. I disagree.
But if we stopped sending personal stuff through the interdepartmental mail, there wouldn't be any interdepartmental mail. Therefore, we are providing a valuable service and keeping the couriers and mail folk employed.
A valid point, it's very true. We need to have positive interdepartmental communications in order to build bridges of forward thinking relationships. Or something like that.
It's not misuse. We've used interoffice mail for items that were not company related. Wouldn't everyone like to get something fun in interoffice mail? It kinda breaks up the day.
Since it's early in the day, I decided to reply to everyone. :)
I totally agree. If it makes someone happy to receive something, then they're happy workers. And happy workers are productive workers. Yet another reason that sidruid was right in his analysis of it being all good.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2003-08-06 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 05:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 07:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 03:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 06:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 11:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 06:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 06:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 06:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 06:55 am (UTC)I totally agree. If it makes someone happy to receive something, then they're happy workers. And happy workers are productive workers. Yet another reason that
no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 06:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 06:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 08:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 09:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 09:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 09:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-07 11:02 am (UTC)